 
|
 Return to the Guestbook |
| |
Guest |
Comments |
Date |
|
| |
Craig Hampton
|
“Five different radiometric dating methods were done on one of Earth’s oldest rock formations and all five methods showed the same age.” Well isn’t that interesting!? It was previously assumed the rock formation was one of the earth’s oldest, and the evolutionists were able to get concurrence from radiometric dating methods that are founded on unproveable assumptions. “Radiometric dating produces results in line with evolutionary expectations about 95% of the time.” And why would it be any different,when the age one is shooting for is already “expected” (assumed) and the dating method used is built on assumptions that cannot be verified (decay rates unchanged throughout time, no presence of daughter element at time zero, etc.) |
3/5/2003 9:41:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
