Your comments
 
Home PageSite MapAbout the authorsAdaptation/MutationAnti CreationBecome a ChristianBig bangBooks to buyConclusionsContact usCreationDarwinDating methodsDinosaursDoes it matterEarly manFloodFossilsGeological columnJoe Baker's pagesLinks to other sitesMake a manOrigin of manQuestions & AnswersReferencesScientific quotesSimple cellsTheory of EvolutionVideos to buyWin $ 1 million
Sign the Guestbook
  Guest Comments Date  
  Ted Moody

Something from nothing - cont: No doubt Darwin observed, and was influenced by the Victorian obsession with 'progress', and theorised that th...MORE 6/25/2004 12:09:03 PM  
 
 
  Ted Moody

Something from nothing? I have pondered long and hard over the idea of evolution, reading everything I could, both for and against. The mathematical ...MORE 6/24/2004 12:56:43 PM  
 
 
  emma mackay
Scotland
enyoyed your chat on Revelation tV about the biblical view of Creation as opposed to evolution and would like to study this more slowly in order to ge...MORE 6/17/2004 1:03:53 PM  
 
 
  Jon Springer
Riverton, Wyoming
www.springertool.com
My Google search for "origins of man" got me this fabulous site! 6/14/2004 9:48:57 AM  
 
 
  Ian

I have felt for years that things like common genetic code amongst species could just as easily be attributed to intelligent design as to evolution. ...MORE 6/7/2004 11:21:09 AM  
 
 
  TEST

Enter your Comments here. 5/28/2004 9:36:23 AM  
 
 
  Kyle

If it weren't for the macro evolutionary paradigm that permeates biology at the moment, DNA that had no immediate explanation for it's functio...MORE 5/26/2004 1:08:24 AM  
 
 
  Matt

Take any course in molecular biology or biochemistry and you will be taught up-to-date material, in an ever changing field. The website in question d...MORE 5/25/2004 5:26:23 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Where does evolutionary theory predict 95% of DNA is "junk"? "Junk" is a term because scientists over the last few decades had no understanding of th...MORE 5/25/2004 5:24:11 PM  
 
 
  Rob Wellman

Paul, although you did not cite the paper which predicts that 95% of DNA will be junk, you have cited a google search which produces many pages in whi...MORE 5/25/2004 2:01:08 PM  
 
 
  Joanna

What a fab site! THanks for all your hard work. All the best for proclaiming the right message about the world to the world itself. We're on your ...MORE 5/24/2004 7:27:02 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland, NZ
I know that it’s off-topic here, but this web site which discusses GM Foods has something to say about what Creationists have complained about for yea...MORE 5/14/2004 2:41:40 AM  
 
 
  Craig Hampton

For goodness sakes Matt, you obviously didn’t heed Paul’s recommendation to do a simple internet search of the phrase “junk DNA.” Instead, you claim ...MORE 5/13/2004 7:56:51 PM  
 
 
  Matt

My comments deal with the number you posted. I am in no need of a sermon on the religious or scientific implications of your determination. My point...MORE 5/13/2004 7:08:56 PM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland, NZ
In reply to Matt, 4/4/2004: -- [cont] Faith in God is simply a right response to the evidence from both observable creation and discoverable commun...MORE 5/13/2004 4:46:38 AM  
 
 
  Paul G.Taylor
Auckland, NZ
In reply to Matt, 4/4/2004: -- Creation by the wisdom and power of God contradicts neither logic nor any laws of nature. It simply maintains a suff...MORE 5/13/2004 4:40:27 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland, NZ
Reply to Matt There is no need to cite any references. A simple search of the Internet for ‘junk DNA’ will turn up over 22,000 sites with this phra...MORE 5/13/2004 4:14:02 AM  
 
 
  Matt

Please site the publication in which this prediction is written, to back up your claim. Thank you. 5/11/2004 5:11:13 PM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland, NZ
The Theory of Evolution predicts that 95% or more of human DNA will be ‘junk’, the leftovers of millions of years of evolutionary trial and error. And...MORE 5/10/2004 3:53:14 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland
www1.minn.net/~science/index.html
THE BIOTIC MESSAGE — The book evolutionists don't want you to know about. ISBN 0-9637999-0-8---------------------------- I've been rea...MORE 4/29/2004 5:56:13 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor

Reply to Mark (2). “start focusing on discovering the true facts” May be you should start discovering some of the true facts of history. There is co...MORE 4/23/2004 5:37:46 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland NZ
Reply to Mark. “It is 2004 after all…” I presume that you mean 2004 AD? Surely you do not think that Anno Domini [in the year of our Lord], referr...MORE 4/23/2004 5:29:23 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor

In reply to Paul (1): -- Teach the facts, along with the controversy over how the facts should be interpreted, then young people will learn how to thi...MORE 4/23/2004 4:12:14 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor

In reply to Paul (2) Paul wrote: -- “It is amazing that the arguments that seem so right to you seem so wrong to me” Not amazing at all really, it...MORE 4/23/2004 4:11:46 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor

In reply to Paul (3) Paul wrote: -- “So if you look at it through a pair of binoculars tonight you will be seeing M31 as it was 2.3 million years ago...MORE 4/23/2004 4:11:08 AM  
 
 
  Craig Hampton

Mark, If it weren't for religion (specifically Christianity) and God, I submit you would have no idea what the "correct things" are. 4/22/2004 11:06:35 AM  
 
 
  Craig Hampton

Mark, Wishful thinking on your part. You need to give some thought to the fact that it’s the people that don’t think about God (not “god”) that we s...MORE 4/22/2004 10:59:56 AM  
 
 
  Mark

I wish people would spend less time thinking about religion and god. It is 2004 after all, and we as human kind or the civilization should advance and...MORE 4/22/2004 8:43:41 AM  
 
 
  Kyle

At best, we can state that light travels at so and such speed at present, and may or may not have traveled as such in times past, due to many unforese...MORE 4/21/2004 2:59:32 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

“The fact is that it been shown to be a constant for 170,000 years.” But again, this is reading into the evidence a historical explanation that cannot...MORE 4/21/2004 2:59:04 PM  
 
 
  Paul

Simon...I checked out that site and here is what it said...This is pasted directly from the site!!! I heard that the speed of light has changed a lot...MORE 4/21/2004 11:13:42 AM  
 
 
  Paul

Simon, Thanks for getting back to me...I don't need to check the site out because I have researched that. I was surprised at what I found. I has...MORE 4/21/2004 11:07:46 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Paul, Please see https://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/c-decay.html about some theories that the speed of light has been slowing down. If this is so, this w...MORE 4/21/2004 10:41:24 AM  
 
 
  Paul

I've been reading you website. I'm frustrated that I'm asked not to teach ideas about a very old Earth. It is amazing that the arguement...MORE 4/21/2004 9:46:50 AM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland
www.trueorigin.org//camplist.asp
Ashby Camp’s List of Articles Supporting Biblical Creation Recently updated https://www.trueorigin.org//camplist.asp ©2001 Ashby Camp — [L...MORE 4/12/2004 5:08:04 AM  
 
 
  Matt

Thank you, Paul. I will check out this site that you have provided. 4/6/2004 4:48:49 PM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland
Reply to Matt “ Please exhibit any materials, publications, scientific offerings that support creations claim, without quoting the good book. The...MORE 4/5/2004 8:42:54 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt final, Either way Matt, I think you need to believe in a miracle to explain how chemicals formed usch highly complex organisms. You choose to bel...MORE 4/4/2004 11:31:23 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt cont. Fossil evidence is know to contain lots of gaps and is highly subjective. Groupings and transitions are based on the idea that Evolution DI...MORE 4/4/2004 11:28:43 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt, If a bacteria contains about 12 Encylopedia Brittanica volumes of information, I would argue that the primeval soup forming bacteria by chance i...MORE 4/4/2004 11:25:12 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Cont. Please exhibit any materials, publications, scientific offerings that support creations claim, without quoting the good book. The arguments pu...MORE 4/4/2004 7:07:17 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Cont. Absolutely I do not. Does it make this possibility unheard of...maybe it does. To the best of my knowledge, nobody has proven that Eve formed...MORE 4/4/2004 7:02:27 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Simon, I'm not asking you to trust or have faith that an amoeba turned into a whale. That is about as ridiculous as the soil turning into Adam. ...MORE 4/4/2004 6:56:48 PM  
 
 
  Paul G. Taylor
Auckland
Jay, 3/20/2004 Science cannot ‘prove’ any theory true. At best a theory is accepted when it has not be falsified after thorough investigation. While...MORE 4/4/2004 12:36:57 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt final, is trust and faith blind? I would argue that if our trust is placed in something trustworthy, it is worthwhile, and Christians would argue...MORE 4/3/2004 1:05:00 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt cont, and so as Christians, we waver between trust and questioning. In time hopefully we come to trust more the God we believe in and what the Bi...MORE 4/3/2004 1:02:12 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt cont. I believe it is good to question, and most Christians do question many aspects of their faith over amny years. However, somethings like lov...MORE 4/3/2004 12:59:16 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt, Science can not prove the virgin birth or the reserrection, or that amoeba turn into Whales, given enough time - CONT 4/3/2004 12:56:44 AM  
 
 
  Matt

Respectfully, Kyle, my question is: if information, be it scientific research on DNA, evolution, what-have-you, would you be able to accept this or wo...MORE 4/2/2004 6:10:15 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Kylie, I do not recall writing that mine is the truth, where as, yours is a falsehood. Despite your apparent penchant for verbosity, my opinion is th...MORE 3/30/2004 4:58:39 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

And Matt, respectfully, you have still not resolved or answered (nor shown published material which has observed, measured, or repeated) how the ribos...MORE 3/30/2004 1:36:20 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

(Cont.) It is the inability of dividing between truth and falsehood (or that any sort of discernable truth can be discerned and comprehended by us) th...MORE 3/30/2004 1:28:16 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

(Cont.) You initially practice the above approach by constantly telling us that our claim to truth is not truthful, and is factually in error. Yet you...MORE 3/30/2004 1:27:29 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

Matt, you realize that in order to hold to some semblance of truth, you have to exclude any and all statements that are counter to your claim of truth...MORE 3/30/2004 1:26:36 PM  
 
 
  Matt

As far as having it both ways; Mr. Lewis is free to examine the world based on his belief system, as are others before him. Your beliefs mold you int...MORE 3/29/2004 10:19:51 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Simon, my comment had to do with the time period, the cultural zeitgeist of the post world war II era, that of C.S. Lewis. How can the context of his...MORE 3/29/2004 10:14:14 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt cont, It seems you want it both ways, if an old quote disagrees with your viewpoint you say it is not good to use because it is old. However, you...MORE 3/29/2004 12:23:28 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt, You made a comment that you can't trust old quotes, yet if I quoted Watson and Crick from the 1950's or whenever, such a quote would sti...MORE 3/29/2004 12:20:51 AM  
 
 
  Matt

Why would the structure of DNA change. It still contains four bases that pair up in unique patterns to code for protein production. That there are c...MORE 3/28/2004 6:38:43 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Matt, I don't believe it is always correct to assume old quote are no good and this works two ways. On the one hand, the structure of DNA has not ...MORE 3/27/2004 1:58:39 AM  
 
 
  Matt

I can't claim to know truth, but neither can you. That does not mean that I am intolerant of your views. My feeling is that in order to ascend, ...MORE 3/26/2004 8:28:02 PM  
 
 
  Matt

Quotes from 1947 are not fitting of this discussion. First, it is the opinion of one man ( which I'm sure you could site further examples, howeve...MORE 3/26/2004 8:24:44 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

‘Men became scientific because they expected Law in Nature, and they expected Law in Nature because they believed in a Legislator. In most modern scie...MORE 3/25/2004 11:05:34 AM  
 
 
  Kyle

“However, does that necessarily mean DNA, RNA, and every other shuffling of atoms within the cell were created by intelligence.” But since we have no ...MORE 3/25/2004 10:59:04 AM  
 
 
  Matt

Yes, ribosomes translate mRNA to protein; and within the code the structure and folding of the ribosomal polypeptide is kept. However, does that neces...MORE 3/24/2004 11:05:46 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

‘Thus the code can not be translated except by using certain products of its translation. This constitutes a baffling circle; a really vicious circle,...MORE 3/23/2004 8:13:10 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

Matt; case in point concerning irreducible complexity: consider that DNA needs the ribosome to facilitate proper decoding of the DNA message, yet the ...MORE 3/23/2004 8:12:20 PM  
 
 
  Kyle

Matt, I think the reason why we have stated as such concerning creation is because of the very point you raise: The intricate interactions and complex...MORE 3/23/2004 8:11:28 PM  
 
 
  Jay

First of all, I would like to say that I don't know which school of thought first. I do agree that, yes, there are flaws in the theory of evolu...MORE 3/20/2004 11:53:18 PM  
 
 
  Simon

RANDOM MUTATIONS CONT: DNA copying mechanism can correct some errors and some errors do not effect any proteins and are know as "silent" mutations. Ot...MORE 3/20/2004 10:40:59 AM  
 
 
  Kitsune

I liked the Passion by mel gibson! And I believe in creation, because the scientific evidence to support the evolution theory is becoming weaker and w...MORE 3/19/2004 9:40:35 AM  
 
 
  Matt

I keep reading on this site, the argument: How could life, all that we observe, have become so complex do to utter randomness; that the chances are so...MORE 3/18/2004 9:31:02 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Schrafinator, If it were true that hundreds of thousands of Scientist have gathered evidence for evolution, then why the Spectator article (see home p...MORE 3/8/2004 1:09:44 AM  
 
 
  Kyle

If self formation by non-teleological forces is statistically improbable to the point of accounting it as an absurdity, then the only option left is: ...MORE 3/7/2004 7:14:30 PM  
 
 
  Jamie Whyte
UK
Doctrinal Christianity has built itself, not upon the injunctions of Jesus, but upon the theories of Paul, and not upon the personality of Jesus of Na...MORE 3/7/2004 5:53:04 AM  
 
 
  schrafinator

This website is the perfect example of the weakest kind of Christian faith; the kind which requires the validation of science to be credible. It...MORE 3/7/2004 5:26:57 AM  
 
 
  Simon

Jeff, true, the Bible was written by people, but scientists are people also and lots of science over the years has been found to be false. Some exampl...MORE 3/7/2004 2:50:20 AM  
 
 
  Jeff

Even if the theory of evolution is not completely correct, it is at least based on scientific observation. Unlike the Bible which was written by peop...MORE 3/5/2004 10:20:12 AM  
 
 
  Evan Griffin
Phizer
I'd just like to say that this site truly doesnt have enough supporting evidence to prove the theory of natural selection...or to prove the inadeq...MORE 3/2/2004 6:33:36 PM  
 
 
  Paul Taylor

A useful discussion of what constitutes a scientific model, with reference to the 'Origins' debate can be found at https://www.trueorigin.or...MORE 2/24/2004 1:55:31 PM  
 
 
  Rebecca

This is a great site, very informative, it helped my a lot with my darwin assignment, thanx 2/23/2004 1:05:50 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

Guest book working again. Thanks to Go-Daddy software for sorting it. 2/22/2004 1:55:21 PM  
 
 
  Carla Teufel
Maine
This is a wonderfully done site! I am very interesting in this topic personally, and have found it to be a great site for use with my 16 yr. old son&...MORE 2/18/2004 3:37:37 PM  
 
 
  Benjamin Frralick

i have one of your shirts that i got 2 years ago it is the " abortion is mean" shirt and i have had many people come to me and ask about it and i told...MORE 2/17/2004 3:54:20 PM  
 
 
  Simon

Been trying to sign this book for the last months, is it working now. Anyway, thanks for the site, good info. 2/17/2004 12:31:46 PM  
 
 
  Joe G.

Yes Ian, it is an unextinguishable revolt because there isn't any reason, logic or science involved with the theory of evolution. There would be o...MORE 1/15/2004 12:36:22 PM  
 
 
  Ian Pearce

sigh, the unextinguishable revolt against reason and science rears it's excruciatingly ugly head again, there's more truth in a page of Dawkin...MORE 1/14/2004 6:37:15 PM  
 
 
  Tom Jones

Your Big Bang page seems to discredit the the idea of a Big Bang, but surely God could have used a Big Bang or similar mechanism as the origin of the ...MORE 1/9/2004 11:06:22 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

The Guest book is working again. Sorry for it not working for the last few weeks. 8th January 2004 1/7/2004 12:20:13 PM  
 
 
  Joe G.

The theory of evolution is ambiguous at best. It can refer to anything from the simple change in allele frequency over time, which is basically variat...MORE 12/13/2003 9:01:09 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

Scott final - please see previous two posts. We would be interested in what are the FACTS that support the Theory of Evolution, without confusing a FA...MORE 12/13/2003 1:48:38 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

Scott cont., In Dr Paul Back's book he descibes how he E-mails a web site of 100 scientists to give he some FACTS about Evolution. They did not co...MORE 12/13/2003 1:46:06 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

Scott, Thanks for your comment. I recently read the book "Darwinism and the rise of degenerate Science" by Dr Paul Back, a Rhodes scholar - continued ...MORE 12/13/2003 1:43:39 AM  
 
 
  Scott

If someone can come up with evidence against evolution the idea would be dead in the water. A scientific theory is not like the term theory that most...MORE 12/11/2003 1:52:04 PM  
 
 
  David Stafford

So 'god' was too weak to cause the big bang and evolution? 12/9/2003 1:18:23 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

David final, As succ, I would argue that neither the Bible or science support the evolution of all species from a bacteria by chance mutations. Best ...MORE 12/9/2003 1:13:33 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

David cont., The Bible says God made man in his image and animals reproduced after their kind. We have to ask, does a mutated bacteria bear the imag...MORE 12/9/2003 1:11:27 AM  
 
 
  Luke Randall

David, Thanks for your comment. No we don't believe God was too weak to cause the Big Bang and evolution, but the question is did he? 12/9/2003 1:08:41 AM  
 
 
  Paul Taylor

HELIUM DIFFUSION RATES SUPPORT ACCELERATED NUCLEAR DECAY https://www.icr.org/research/icc03/pdf/Helium_ICC_7-22-03.pdf Recent work by a group of...MORE 12/2/2003 7:54:59 PM  
   
 
 
     
Page:  1  
 

Home Page | Site Map | About the authors | Adaptation/Mutation | Anti Creation | Become a Christian | Big bang | Books to buy | Conclusions | Contact us | Creation | Darwin | Dating methods | Dinosaurs | Does it matter | Early man | Flood | Fossils | Geological column | Joe Bake's pages | Links to other sites | Make a man | Origin of man | Questions & Answers | References | Scientific quotes | Simple cells | Theory of Evolution | Videos to buy | Win $ 1.3 million | Your quotes




Go Daddy Software