Your quotes
 
Home PageSite MapAbout the authorsAdaptation/MutationAnti CreationBecome a ChristianBig bangBooks to buyConclusionsContact usCreationDarwinDating methodsDinosaursDoes it matterEarly manFloodFossilsGeological columnJoe Baker's pagesLinks to other sitesMake a manOrigin of manQuestions & AnswersReferencesScientific quotesSimple cellsTheory of EvolutionVideos to buyWin $ 1.3 millionYour comments

The present form of the "Your comments" does not allow for easy searching back for specific comments.The aim of this page is to add notable comments from the "Your comments" page in some sort of subject order. Lots of very interesting and or helpful comments with links are posted on the "Your comments" page and hopefully this page will allow people to look back at specific comments under a subject index. This page was started in December 2003. The previous guest-book had about 700 comments and a new guest-book was started in December 2003.

Anti Creation

Biblical doubts

Evolution - for

Evolution - against

Scientific model for creation

Thanks

Young earth

Anti Creation

Sigh, the unextinguishable revolt against reason and science rears it's excruciatingly ugly head again, there's more truth in a page of Dawkins or Gould than in the entire mass of creationist twattle. Get a life and offline. Posted by Ian 15.1.04

Response to above. Yes Ian, it is an unextinguishable revolt because there isn't any reason, logic or science involved with the theory of evolution. There would be only if you re-define reason, logic & science. f there was any evidence that showed mutations could accumulate in the way needed by the ToE then we wouldn't be having this "revolt". Take care. Poster by Joe G. 15.1.04.

This website is the perfect example of the weakest kind of Christian faith; the kind which requires the validation of science to be credible. It's even more sad that people think that somehow, even if Darwin was wrong, and the hundreds of thousands of sceintists who have accumulated evidence of the last 150 years are also wrong, and all of the corroborating evidence from Geology, Genetics, Paleontology, Astronomy, Physics, and many other fields is also wrong, this doesn't make Creationism correct. 'dichotomy. Reject the entirety of science in favor of your religion if you will, but realize that this is exactly what you must do if you accept Young Earth Creationism. Posted by Schrafinator 7.3.04.

Response to above. Schrafinator, If it were true that hundreds of thousands of Scientist have gathered evidence for evolution, then why the Spectator article (see home page). Evidence and extrapolation of evidence are not the same. Poster by Simon 8.3.04
 

See also Anti Creation page of this site. BACK TO TOP

Biblical doubts

Even if the theory of evolution is not completely correct, it is at least based on scientific observation.  Unlike the Bible which was written by people, and contains thousands of stories most of which can and have been proved to be fiction by science. Posted by Jeff on 6.03.04 BACK TO TOP

Evolution - support for

If someone can come up with evidence against evolution the idea would be dead in the water. A scientific theory is not like the term theory that most people accept, it means it is supported by fact. Posted by Scott on 11.12.03 BACK TO TOP  Response

Evolution - against

The theory of evolution is ambiguous at best. It can refer to anything from the simple change in allele frequency over time, which is basically variation, to the vast changes some people insist have occured. However there isn't any biological or genetic evidence that supports the premise that single-celled organinisms can evolve into multi-cellular organisms or any of the other alleged great transformations that evolutionists want us to believe have occured. Posted by Joe G on 13.12.03

I'd just like to say that this site truly doesnt have enough supporting evidence to prove the theory of natural selection...or to prove the inadequacy of what christians belive. I myself am a christian and I've recently been looking into the evoltotion today...and frankly, its just a bunch of mumbo jumbo. You said it yourself, there are too many loop holes and unexplicable areas of evolution for it to be an accurate theory. Posted by Evan Griffin on 02.03.04  BACK TO TOP

Scientific model for creation

"A useful discussion of what constitutes a scientific model, with reference to the 'Origins' debate can be found at https://www.trueorigin.org/creatheory.asp" Posted by Paul Taylor on 24.2.04 BACK TO TOP

Thanks

"This is a wonderfully done site! I am very interesting in this topic personally, and have found it to be a great site for use with my 16 yr. old son's homeschooling. You have presented the information very clearly. Thank you !!" Posted 18.2.04 by Carla.

"This is a great site, very informative, it helped my a lot with my darwin assignment, thanx." Posted by Rebecca on 23.2.04 BACK TO TOP

Young earth

"HELIUM DIFFUSION RATES SUPPORT ACCELERATED NUCLEAR DECAY https://www.icr.org/research/icc03/pdf/Helium_ICC_7-22-03.pdf. Recent work by a group of scientists have brought more laboratory evidence that the radiometric dates of millions of years are explained better as evidence of recent creation and massively speeded up radioactive decay". Posted by Paul Taylor on 2.12.03 BACK TO TOP

 

Home Page | Site Map | About the authors | Adaptation/Mutation | Anti Creation | Become a Christian | Big bang | Books to buy | Conclusions | Contact us | Creation | Darwin | Dating methods | Dinosaurs | Does it matter | Early man | Flood | Fossils | Geological column | Joe Bake's pages | Links to other sites | Make a man | Origin of man | Questions & Answers | References | Scientific quotes | Simple cells | Theory of Evolution | Videos to buy | Win $ 1.3 million | Your comments




Go Daddy Software